Water and flood feasibility assessment
You send the parcel boundary, the proposed megawatts, the campus acreage, and the location. We return a decision memo, not a design.
Municipal supply, groundwater and nearby wells, the aquifer setting, drought history, competing demand, surface water, and reclaimed-water options.
The watershed, drainage paths, FEMA flood zones, terrain from public LiDAR, historical flooding, rainfall intensity, runoff, and drainage constraints.
Drought, extreme precipitation, temperature, and published future-climate projections supported by compound impacts assessments.
Flooded, steep, wetland, and utility-corridor acres called out against a preliminary developable area. Of a 1,000-acre parcel, those constraints can leave roughly half preliminarily developable. The acres are illustrative until the boundary is checked.
Proposed cooling demand set next to indicated supply in a normal year, a dry year, a severe drought, and a future climate case. The memo says whether the load fits, and what would have to change if it does not.
The memo is 15 to 25 pages. A two-page summary sits in front: the decision, sources, demand, drought, groundwater, flood, regulatory notes, the map, and what to do next. A desktop screen takes about ten business days. It is not a water-supply assessment under California law and not a commitment from the water supplier.